Skip to Main Content
ᴅɪᴀɴᴀ ᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ. ( WONDER WOMAN ) (
wondie
) wrote
2010
-
07
-
02
11:39 pm
I N B O X.
orbiter.//private-message-inbox
username: diana
[ AVAILABLE ]
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
april 1st misfire » un: nightingale
ettersberg
2018-04-01 04:35 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm afraid I forgot to send this earlier.
[
IMAGE ATTACHED
]
no subject
wondie
2018-04-01 06:13 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm glad this wrong was righted, he looks truly dashing.
(
absolutely no mention of this being weird. feel free to send her pug pics all the time.
)
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-01 07:01 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
That was my thought as well.
[ it's dignified, isn't it? ]
no subject
wondie
2018-04-01 07:35 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
(
oh. incredibly.
)
Does this fine gentleman have a name?
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-01 07:37 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
His name is JB.
[ he isn't thomas'. ]
no subject
wondie
2018-04-01 11:20 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
(
WHY NOT ... everyone needs a pug in their lives...
)
He's a dear, I appreciate your sharing. I don't get many unprovoked pet pictures, a which is a shame.
(
bc grown demigoddesses love pet pictures, too!!
)
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-02 06:35 am (UTC)
(
link
)
[ well. he has jb in his life now, doesn't he? if on a somewhat temporary basis. surely eggsy will let him borrow the dog if he feels a lack of pug. ]
I don't generally send pet pictures, much less unprovoked. But I suppose in this case, no apologies are in order.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-03 04:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Not at all. You may send me pictures of JB anytime.
Though I take it that you are victim to the same transmission errors as many.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-03 06:12 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I am indeed. I meant to send this to JB's owner. I was watching JB for him for a while.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-09 05:38 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Well, know that JB's pictures are quite safe with me.
Well, relatively. I might show them to others in need of a dapper gentleman. But only eyes that can be trusted, I assure you.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-10 04:55 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
So long as they are trustworthy eyes, I suppose that's quite all right.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-10 07:03 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
You have my word, these photographs will not fall into dangerous hands.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-10 07:51 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Then I trust you are a person of your word.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-15 02:08 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Thank you. I promise that trust is not misplaced.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-15 01:13 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
That is a relief to hear, of course.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-15 03:08 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Do you get to spend time with JB often?
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-16 08:16 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
So far, it has only been one time. But that was rather prolonged.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-16 11:43 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm not sure I want to ask why.
(
even if she doesn't ask, she can guess it has to do with the kidnappings.
)
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-18 12:23 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I suppose you've heard of the kidnappings and rescue effort.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-19 02:36 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I have. I missed the worst of the attacks due to traveling but it would impossible not to hear of them.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-19 07:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Quite. JB's owner was involved in the rescue and asked me to look after JB in the meantime.
no subject
wondie
2018-04-25 02:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I hope his owner returned in relatively one piece. My partner was a part of the rescue and didn't come back without his scars.
(
physical, yes, but emotional more.
)
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-25 05:18 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Relatively, yes.
[ who knows what mental scars eggsy may take away from the experience. ]
no subject
wondie
2018-04-30 12:56 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I think most involved are relatively fine, rather than completely.
no subject
ettersberg
2018-04-30 06:47 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I'm afraid so.
(no subject)
wondie
-
2018-05-07 03:54 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
ettersberg
-
2018-05-08 19:53 (UTC)
-
Expand
368 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
april 1st misfire » un: nightingale
[ IMAGE ATTACHED ]
no subject
( absolutely no mention of this being weird. feel free to send her pug pics all the time. )
no subject
[ it's dignified, isn't it? ]
no subject
Does this fine gentleman have a name?
no subject
[ he isn't thomas'. ]
no subject
He's a dear, I appreciate your sharing. I don't get many unprovoked pet pictures, a which is a shame.
( bc grown demigoddesses love pet pictures, too!! )
no subject
I don't generally send pet pictures, much less unprovoked. But I suppose in this case, no apologies are in order.
no subject
Though I take it that you are victim to the same transmission errors as many.
no subject
no subject
Well, relatively. I might show them to others in need of a dapper gentleman. But only eyes that can be trusted, I assure you.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
( even if she doesn't ask, she can guess it has to do with the kidnappings. )
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
( physical, yes, but emotional more. )
no subject
[ who knows what mental scars eggsy may take away from the experience. ]
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)